MAYANAGI Makoto
The Oriental Medicine Research Center of the Kitasato
Institute
5-9-1 Shirogane, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Inany system of medicine, treatment and hygiene form an inseparable relationship.
(In this discussion, "hygiene" is used in its classical Greek sense of
a regimen for the promotion of health.) Especially if our definition of
illness is expanded to include general ill health, or a lack of wellness,
it becomes very difficult to clearly differentiate between these two aspects
of medicine.
A close relationship exists between
treatment and hygiene not only in modern medicine, but also in the traditional
medicines of East and West. Hygiene was given at least as much, if not
more, value than treatment in the past, when the available treatments were
not as decisive in effect as modern medicine is in treating otherwise fatal
diseases. Thus a wealth of experience and knowledge was accumulated about
hygiene. In our times, when fatal infectious disease has for the most part
been conquered, people are beginning to show renewed interest in traditional
medicine and we must not overlook the major role once played by concepts
of hygiene.
Chinese medicine in particular has
a long tradition of emphasizing hygiene. Although there are many aspects
of and objectives to hygiene, here I wish to concentrate on the connection
between treatment and hygiene - or more specifically, on hygiene for those
who are already ill. Because a great deal of material has been lost over
time, there is a problem with the paucity of medical literature and references
on this subject from medieval and pre-medieval China, but I believe that
it is at least possible to shed some light on certain aspects of the issue
if the scope of discussion is limited. Therefore, I am surveying the subject
based on my study of the Xiao Pin Fang, a Chinese medical text highly
regarded in medieval times. In discussing that work, I hope to elucidate
the relationship between the medieval concepts of hygiene and pharmacotherapy.
SOME BACKGROUND ON THE XIAO PIN FANG
The medical text Xiao Pin Fang,
consisting of twelve volumes, was written by a Chinese physician named
Chen Yan Zhi.*2 In the 8th century, theXiao
Pin Fang was designated as a compulsory text for Japanese medical students,
concomitant with Japan's imitation of the Tang*3legal code. During that period, the Xiao Pin Fang was highly acclaimed
in Japan as an important medical work.
But by the time of the Northern Song*4dynasty (960-1127), the Xiao Pin Fang could no longer be found in
China, even in the Imperial Court Library. The text was thought to have
been irretrievably lost, both in China and Japan, from that time forth.
My colleagues and I, however, have
been extremely fortunate in discovering a hand-copied edition of the first
half of the first volume of the Xiao Pin Fang in the Son Kei Kaku*5Library in Tokyo. Previously, the time period during which this text had
been written was unknown, but with the discovery of this copy, it was established
as between 454 and 473 A.D., during the Southern dynasty (Liu-Song*6)
of the North and South Kingdoms.1) This
discovery of a portion of the Xiao Pin Fang and the determination
of its approximate date of origin have afforded for us valuable insight
into the condition of medicine during that period, and has provided historical
perspective on various related fields.
The contents of the extant portion
of the Xiao Pin Fang can be divided into seven sections: (l) preface
and bibliography, (2) a list of contents for all twelve volumes, (3) precautions
in combining crude drugs, (4) methods for processing crude drugs, (5) standard
weights and volumes for crude drugs, (6) analysis of the background of
diseases, and instructions for administering prescriptions, and (7) prescriptions
for specific diseases.
Here, I will focus on the seventeen
articles in the sixth section, which is titled "Shu Kan Fang Ji Ni He
Bei Ji Yao jue."*7 This section contains
an analysis of the factors which are part of the background of a disease:
factors such as climate, sex, age, and physical constitution. Logically
consistent instruction is then given for administering medication according
to those variables and the severity of the disease. This section of theXiao
Pin Fang is, quite literally, an extended discourse on the connection
between treatment and hygiene. Therefore, I will introduce each of the
seventeen articles in order, and examine them from the perspective of hygiene
as it pertains to the realm of pharmacotherapy.
YAN ZHI'S*8 APPROACH TO MEDICINE
Rules of Treatment
In the first article, Yan Zhi sets
forth the following basic rules of treatment as an introduction to the
seventh section.
At the end of this passage, Yan
Zhi establishes a hierarchy of priorities in the study of medicine, starting
with the treatment of acute, life-threatening diseases and progressing
on to means of aiding convalescence. In short, his emphasis was on a acute
diseases. Hygiene, the last thing to be studied, is expressed by the Chinese
characters (bu wei*9) which mean
"support" and "protect." Thus, in this context, hygiene can be understood
as the promotion of recovery and the prevention of relapse through pharmacotherapy.
Interestingly, traditional ancient
Chinese concepts of medicine differ from Yan Zhi's approach in that hygiene,
particularly the prevention of disease, is given primary emphasis. This
view is expressed not only in classical medical texts such as the Su
Wen*10 (0-200
A.D.), but also in non-medical works such as Lao Zi*11and Huai Nan Zi*12 which contain
passages such as: "The best form of medicine is that which treats diseases
before they appear." 2,3,4) In other words,
the ideal is to regulate physiological condition before pathological signs
are manifested. In contrast to this, Yan Zhi's approach to medicine tends
to emphasize the condition after a disease has occurred, or the treatment
of pathological conditions, which is then complemented by the regulation
of physiological condition (hygienic concepts) to promote recovery.
It can be said that Yan Zhi's approach,
rather than refuting traditional concepts of medicine, was perhaps an attempt
at establishing a better balance between treatment and hygiene by advocating
a medical model which emphasized treatment. On the other hand, in his preface,
Yan Zhi takes a critical stance on contemporary hygienic practices and
medical treatments for serious cases. His comments give evidence of a strong
character, and assert that, in a sense, any approach to medicine which
emphasizes only one aspect of hygiene or treatment is not practical.
Rules for Diagnosis and Selection of Prescriptions
Article 2 goes a step further than
Article 1, introducing several aspects of diagnosis:
The causes of disease Yan Zhi lists
follow a specific sequence: first are factors related to internal medicine
(climate, life style, and emotional changes), second are gynecological
factors and factors related to surgical medicine, and last come the adverse
effects of drugs taken for therapy or longevity.5)Such an ordered list of pathogenic factors is unusual in early Chinese
medical texts, and this passage probably represents the oldest such list.
Nevertheless, only the pathogenic factors are listed, and no further explanation
is given. Judging by the way this article is written, the list of pathogenic
factors is most likely presented only for the sake of introduction. The
main point of this passage seems to be the suggestion in its latter half
that pulse palpation is not always necessary.
In the third section of this text,
however, Yan Zhi criticizes intellectuals who do not believe in pulse palpation.
Also there are repeated references to pulse palpation and pathogenic factors
throughout this work. So it is also clear that Yan Zhi did not consider
pulse palpation for the determination of pathogenic factors to be totally
unnecessary in medical treatment. Given that fact, one might wonder why
he lists the pathogenic factors only to state that questioning the patient
and administering conventional prescriptions or their variations was often
sufficient.
In his preface, Yan Zhi states that
the composition of and indications for the traditional prescriptions he
has recorded were determined through numerous examinations for pathogenic
factors and a great deal of clinical experience. He also asserts that it
is not always necessary to determine pathogenic factors when traditional
formulas are used, and he goes on to state that such a prescription can
be used if only half of its indications correspond with the patient's
symptoms. Why, then, were just half of the indications considered
to be enough? If traditional prescriptions were in fact formulated through
accumulated experience, ostensibly all the symptoms likely to occur due
to a certain pathogenic factor would be included. However, idiosyncratic
symptoms unique to each patient would not necessarily be included by this
inductive process. Since there are individual physiological differences
between patients, it is not likely that all the symptoms related to a certain
pathogenic factor would appear. In his preface, Yan Zhi also states that
traditional prescriptions need to be modified according to the physiological
characteristics of patients, who are each subject to different conditions,
and also in consideration of the action and characteristics of the drugs.
For the reasons mentioned, only half of the indications need to be present,
but the prescription must be modified to take care of the symptoms not
included among its indications.
ANALYSIS OF THE BACKGROUND OF DISEASES AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR ADMINISTERING MEDICATION
Types of Patients, Severity of Diseases, and Dosage
In Articles 3 through 8, medication
dosage is stipulated and the reason for using a particular dosage is explained
on the basis of severity of the disease (Article 3); length of time from
the onset of illness (Article 4); physical strength, age and experience
in taking medication (Articles 5 and 6); young or strong patients with
mild illnesses verses old or weak patients with severe chronic illnesses
(Articles 7 and 8). Since the contents of each of these articles is organized
according to indications for large doses vs. indications for small doses,
they can be summarized as follows:
When to Use Larger Doses and Why
When to Use Smaller Doses and Why
As is clear from the summary above,
each of the corresponding items under the two headings ((a) & (a'),
(b) &. (b'), etc.) deal with completely opposite conditions and lead
to opposite conclusions. The Logical progression is nevertheless fully
consistent. Viewing the above conditions, the first thing worth noting
is the information used. All this information can be readily obtained by
questioning and visual examination, and the degree of subjectivity in such
judgements is not so great. Moreover, three basic parameters are used.
That is, general information about the individual (age and physical strength),
information regarding the individual's pathological condition (symptoms
and duration of illness), and information about the individual's use of
medication (experience with medication). This information is all related
to individual characteristics of the patient, and thus a basic formula
of pathology - individual - medication, with the individual at the center,
can be derived.
Examining the logical progression
which follows the initial condition given in each of the items above, we
can identify specific concepts being used as logical premises, which I
will outline later. These concepts or premises are used to determine the
patient's strength or physiological condition during the period of illness,
which in turn becomes the basis for deciding on the dose of medication
used to fulfill specific aims. These aims are: first, to minimize the adverse
effects of the medication on the patient's physiology; and second, to maximize
its beneficial effects on their pathology. Given this perspective, a larger
dose is recommended under the first heading, thus achieving a balance between
the first and second aims in (a) and (b), and attaining the second aim
in (c) and (d). Likewise, smaller doses are recommended under the second
heading in all of the items from (a') to (d') for the sake of the second
aim.
In ancient texts on Chinese medicine,
the dosage of medication is very seldom discussed from the standpoint of
the first aim, minimizing adverse effects. Usually, the dose is based solely
on the inter-relationship between pathology and pharmacology (i.e., the
effect of the medication). For example, according to the general rules
in the Su Wen,6) if the pathological
condition is mild, as in (a) under the first heading, the dose is decreased,
and if the pathological condition is severe, as in (a') under the second
heading, the dose is increased. Yan Zhi's logic, because it takes into
account the individual's physiology and the adverse effect of the medication,
gives the exact opposite instructions concerning dosage. This clearly reflects
his unique approach to medicine, emphasizing the physiological condition
of the individual not only in the recovery stage, but also during the period
of illness. The practical explanations he gives stress both aspects of
using medication-its beneficial and adverse effects. This also indicates
a perception of a triad of pathology, pharmacology, and physiology with
pharmacology as the central component.
Now, returning to the concepts used
as the premises for Yan Zhi's logical progression, they can be summarized
as follows:
(l) The effect of the medication controls the illness
(pharmacological action suppresses pathology).
(2) The illness reduces physical strength (pathology
suppresses physiology).
(3) The effect of the medication reduces physical strength
(pharmacological action suppresses physiology).
(4) Physical strength reduces the effect of the medication
(physiology suppresses pharmacological action).
(5) The continuous use of medication reduces the effect
of the medication (physiology suppresses pharmacological action).
Cautions for Menstruation
In Article 9 the following recommendations
are made for treating women during menstruation:
Zhang Zhong Jing's Jin Gui Yao
Lue*17 also discusses cases of contracting
a seasonal illness such as a febrile disease during menstruation, and instructions
are given for treatment according to the symptoms. 13)
Article 9 above mentions first the need to determine if menstruation is
a factor, and second the need to differentiate between the symptoms of
menstruation and the disease itself. This is clearly an approach which
discriminates between an individual's physiology and pathology. The article
also states that, if treatment is given without differentiating between
the symptoms, the pathological condition can be aggravated because menstruation
and the illness may mutually affect each other.
The logical basis for that assumption
is derived from the interrelationship of physiology (menstruation), pathology
(seasonal illness), and pharmacology (pharmacotherapy) expressed in Figure
2. Nevertheless, since this article does not specifically mention the
physiological changes which take place during menstruation, the aggravation
of the pathological condition cannot be fully explained by the logical
construct represented in Figure 2. Be that as it may, the importance
of taking the individual's physiological condition into account in treatment
is shown in this article in a concrete way.
Constitution, Disease, and Dosage in Relation to Locality
Articles 10 and 11 mention differences
in physical constitution and susceptibility to disease based on geographical
region, and Article 12 mentions ways of adjusting dosage based on those
differences.
ARTICLE 11
ARTICLE 12
Two theories were prevalent in
Yan Zhi's time concerning the relationship between geographical regions
and physical constitution, disease, and treatment. The first one was based
on the Su Wen and the five element principle. It divided China into
five regions: center, north, south, east, and west.14) The second theory
divided China into two sections: the cold northern and western section,
and the warm southern and eastern section. Yan Zhi adopts a similar position
to the latter theory by saying that differences in the climate in the regions
where people live produce differences in skin function and call for corresponding
changes in medication. The Ling Shu contains a passage in which
the five element principle is multiplied to categorize physical constitutions
into twenty-five different types,15) but
obviously this theory is completely different from Yan Zhi's approach.
Regional differences are emphasized
to such an extent because, above all, of the historical circumstances of
the time. During this period, China was under the rule of two opposing
governments in the north and the south. There were repeated victories and
reversals between the two powers. It is recorded in the Qian Jin Fang*26,
how, when the Han*27 Chinese began to immigrate
southward in the beginning of the fourth century because of invaders from
the north and west, they encountered diseases unique to the south which
they had never known before.16) The regions
mentioned in the above three articles are all in south China, and these
regions are all located around the Yang Zi*28River as the northern, southern, eastern, and western regions. Also the
fact that Yan Zhi never mentions the regions further to the north, around
the Yellow River, such as He Bei*29 or
Guan Zhong*30 clearly reveals that he was
primarily concerned with the climatic conditions of regions in south China.
What is particularly noteworthy in
Articles 10 and 11 is the premise that the occurrence of beriberi is primarily
due to physiological factors, and that dampness, the pathogenic factor,
is secondary. The physiological factors are: first, the condition of the
skin and second, the strength or weakness of shen qi (kidney energy).
These physiological variables could be thought of as components of the
physical constitution, in a sense. It is easy to understand how that simple
idea might have come about in line with traditional concepts of pathogenesis
that dampness entering the body was related to the condition of the skin.
But why is shen qi mentioned in this context?
Beriberi happens to be one of the
main diseases discussed in these articles. From our modern perspective,
it is easy to see that its prevalence in southern China was due to vitamin
B1 deficiency resulting from the consumption of white rice among the upper
class. As beriberi progresses, the symptoms of edema and oliguria begin
to appear. These symptoms were known from early on, as was accurately recorded
by Ge Hong*31 (283-343).17)
According to traditional medical concepts
recorded in texts like the Su Wen, shen qi is the fundamental energy
of life, and the function of water metabolism and excretion are controlled
by this energy. This gives us our explanation: since edema and oliguria
are the result of abnormalities in this energy, not only is dampness examined
as the pathogenic factor, but shen qi is also discussed as an individual
factor.
Incidentally, Yan Zhi mentions "diseases
from bites by poisonous insects" apart from malaria. It is inferred that
these are diseases in which insect bites are clearly the cause. These would
be diseases with the initial symptoms of swelling and infection in the
skin. When viewed in this way, it is easy to follow Yan Zhi's logic that
the occurrence of such diseases shows different tendencies according to
geographical region, based on differences in skin condition. In this manner,
through Articles 10 and 11, we can see that the concept of an individual's
physiology is applied not only in determining treatment, but also in explaining
the mechanism involved in contracting a disease.
Article 12 recommends modifying prescriptions
according to the variable of regional difference in temperature. As far
as disease-categories which call for prescription modification by region,
only the general category of "disease accompanied by coldness" is mentioned.
The point there is clear: Give prescriptions with more warming drugs for
patients living in cold regions who complain of "coldness," and give prescriptions
with less of these ingredients for those living in a warm region. It is
clear that the grounds of this logic is the basic principle of treatment
recorded in theSu Wen and the Shen Nong Ben Cao Jing as
"prescribe warming medication for coldness, cooling medication for hotness."18)Yan Zhi adds to this basic principle the regional variable, a factor concerned
with individual differences, and suggests how the prescription can be modified.
In this manner, Articles 10 through
12 address the issue of the region where the patient lives. Through this
discussion, we can understand that in Yan Zhi's thinking, the climate where
one lives is a kind of individual factor, in fact the most basic factor
in determining physical constitution, mechanism of contracting disease,
and modifications for prescriptions. Naturally, his thinking is based on
the principles in the Su Wen and Shen Nong Ben Cao Jing,
but we must also not overlook the political events of his day as a historical
background which influenced his perceptions.
Types of Diseases and Treatment Guidelines
Articles 13 through 17 give basic
guidelines for treatment, along with precautionary explanations. Article
13 provides an overall out-line; Article 14 deals mainly with treatment
using purgatives; Article 15 is primarily about effecting recovery with
tonic drugs; Article 16 deals with prevention of disease by the use of
purgatives; and Article 17 covers general matters. These articles comprise
a somewhat lengthy dissertation, but since they are essentially the conclusion
of this section, I will render the entire text below.
ARTICLE 14
ARTICLE 15
ARTICLE 16
ARTICLE 17
In the above articles, Yan Zhi's
discussion of treatment at time implies new viewpoints. These viewpoints
are essentially concerned with the following four issues: (1) effects of
purgatives, tonics, and harmonizing drugs, (2) the form of medication administered,
(3) the order of administering medication, and (4) the prognosis. What
views does Yan Zhi express concerning these issues? I would like to answer
this question by examining each issue individually.
Classification of Drugs by Their Effects
The beneficial effects of purgatives
are described in the above articles as follows; they expel the pathogenic
factor (Article 14), expel matter accumulated in the chest and abdomen
as well as pathological humors, and remove distension in the abdomen and
stagnation of food caused by continued use of tonic medication (Article
16). In other words, the beneficial effects of purgatives are a result
of their action on the pathogenic factor and pathology.
The adverse effects of purgatives
are as follows: They exhaust the vital essence of life (Article 13), and
reduce physical strength (Articles 14 and 15). Both of these effects relate
to the physiology of the patient. As pointed out before, this concept of
recognizing both the beneficial and adverse effects of drugs is very similar
to that recorded in the Shang Han Lun.*32It may be assumed that the purgative medications alluded to in the above
articles are those varieties in the Shang Han Lun such as cheng
qi tang*33 which contains rhei rhizoma.
The beneficial effects of tonic medications
are naturally in strengthening the body (Articles 16 and 17), and tonics
were used to help the body recover its strength after being weakened by
the administration of purgatives (Article 15). In both these situations,
there is an effect on the physiology. The adverse effects of tonics are
mentioned in some detail as follows: They cause the force of the disease
to return (Article 15), and if taken in excess or for too long, distension
in the abdomen becomes a problem (Article 16). In other words, the first
effect is on the pathology and the latter effect is on the physiology.
These passages bring to mind tonic drugs such as aconiti tuber which, when
used incorrectly, can exacerbate fevers, and rehmanniae radix, which can
cause distension in the abdomen. It seems very possible that when Yan Zhi
discussed the adverse effects of tonic medications, he had in mind formulas
which contained the above-mentioned crude drugs, such as the ba wei
wan*34 recorded in the Jin Gui Yao
Lue. In any case, none of the extant medical texts older than the Xiao
Pin Fang, like the Nei Jing,*35Shen
Nong Ben Cao Jing, andShang Han Lun, have so a clear a description
of the adverse effects of tonic medications. Furthermore, the recognition
that adverse effects occur not only upon the physiology, but also in strengthening
the pathology, is noteworthy as a point in common with modern pharmacology.
Harmonizing drugs are mentioned in
Articles 13 and 15, and the situations which they are used are as follows:
When there is a pathogenic factor which must be expelled with purgatives,
but it is dangerous to administer the latter because the vital essence
of life is exhausted (Article 13); when the pathogenic factor has been
expelled with a purgative but its adverse effects have reduced physical
strength, and tonics cannot be used at that point since the pathology could
reappear (Article 15). This means that harmonizing drugs do not have the
adverse effects of purgatives and tonics and that they can serve as a substitute
for both. Further, it is inferred from the information in Article 13 that
the effect of harmonizing drugs is to replenish the vital essence of life,
and while they halt the progress of a disease, they have no effect in expelling
the pathogenic factor. Similarly, from Article 15 it is clear that, while
harmonizing drugs have the effect of increasing physical strength after
a decline, they are inferior to tonic drugs. In other words, harmonizing
drugs have a beneficial effect in terms of both the pathology and the physiology,
but in these respects their effect is weaker than purgative and tonic drugs.
Incidentally, the character used for
harmonizing drugs in the orignnal text is ping,*36which means even. To understand this, note that in the Shen Nong Ben
Cao Jing, the purgative drug rhei rhizoma and the tonic drug rehmanniae
radix are said to have a cooling effect, represented by the character han,*37which means cold. The tonic drug aconiti tuber is stated to warm the body,
and this effect is represented by the character wen,*38 which means
warm.19)
The drugs represented with the character
ping can be used for either warming or cooling the body.20)So, Yan Zhi, in contrasting harmonizing drugs with purgative and tonic
drugs, seems to indicate that harmonizing drugs possess properties closely
resembling the meaning of the characterping ("even"). It can be
hypothesized that Yan Zhi is referring to the following crude drugs mentioned
in the Shen Nong Ben Cao Jing and Ming Yi Bie Lu: buplenri
radix, described as having "even and non-toxic properties, serves to increase
the essence of life"2l); glycyrrhizae radix,
described as having "even and non-toxic properties; serves to strengthen
the body.''22) Ginseng radix is described
as "Non-toxic, with very slight cooling or warming properties; tonifies
the function of the internal organs."23)The formula for xiao chai hu tang*39given in the Shang Han Lun can be cited as a prime example of a
harmonizing medication which contains the above drugs. Such formulas are
used to regulate the pathological condition when neither purgatives nor
tonics can be used.
There is no specific mention of sudorifics
in the articles I've discussed. This is probably because diagnosis and
treatment in the early stages of a disease, which is when sudorifics are
indicated, is mainly covered in Articles 3 through 8. Further, the effects
of sudorifics are identical to those for the purgatives mentioned in Articles
13 through 16.
Clasification of Effect | Corresponding Drugs | Corresponding Formulas | Benefical Effects | Adverse Effects |
Purgative (Sudorific) | Rhei Rizoma (Ephedrae Herba) | Cheng Qi Tang (Mahuang Tang) | on pathology (on pathology) | on physiology (on physiology) |
Tonic | Aconiti Tuber Rehmanniae Radix | Ba Wei Wan | on physiology | on physiology and pathology |
Harmonizing | Buplenri Radix Glycyrrhizae Radix Ginseng Radix | Xiao Chaihu Tang | on physiology and pathology (weak effect) | none(?) |
The results of my preceding examination on the classification of drugs and their effects are organized in Table 1. As can been seen from the table, in Yan Zhi's three categories, drugs and prescriptions are clearly differentiated by whether they have beneficial or adverse effects in relation to pathology and physiology. It is somewhat doubtful, however, whether Yan Zhi was considering this type of classification for all traditional drugs and to just what extent this classification is practical in application. Be that as it may, this type of classification is remarkably similar to the three-tiered classification system known as top, middle, and bottom, and to the concept of beneficial and adverse effects found in the Shen Nong Ben Cao Jing.24)On the other hand, Yan Zhi's view of the effects of drugs and prescriptions is basically the same as that found in the Shang Han Lun and theJin Gui Yao Lue. Furthermore, his classification of drugs is very compatible with the classification of pathological conditions according to the san yin san yang*40 principle, which is at the core of the Shang Han Lun. These similarities all serve as indications of Yan Zhi's medical background.
The Form of Medication Administered
The three typical forms for traditional
Chinese medications are decoctions, powders, and pills. The resultant differences
in effect of the medication involved was debated from earliest times. For
example, the Shang Han Lun states: "To induce diarrhea, it is better
to use decoctions rather than pills or powder."25)Although there may be some exceptions, the fact that decoctions produce
the fastest and strongest effect is common knowledge that can be obtained
through experience. This being the case, what does Yan Zhi have to say
about the use of these three forms of medication?
Article 14 gives a typical example
of Yan Zhi's views on such matters. There, the somewhat different effects
of decoctions, pills, and powders are used to enhance the beneficial effects
and minimize the adverse effect of purgatives. Article 15 goes on to state
that administering tonics as a decoction can have an adverse effect, so
instead, controlled amounts of pills or powders should be prescribed. Article
16 mentions that strong tonification with the intent of preventing diseases
can have an adverse effect, recommending mild tonification by using pills
or powder in some cases. In either case, mild tonification using pills
or powder is recommended for an ordinary loss of strength, and strong tonification
using decoctions is limited to cases of extreme debility, as in Article
17.
It is clear from the preceding observations
that the direct aim of selectively using different forms of medication
is to regulate drug effects. In Articles 3 through 8, as well as 12, dosage
of medication is discussed in the same context. The basic difference between
these earlier articles and the articles discussed above lies in their perspective.
The former is concerned with the type of disease and the patient, while
the latter is based on a classification of the effects of drugs. The reason
that the form of medication is not discussed in the former case is that
those articles are mainly concerned with the early stage of diseases, when
sudorifics or purgatives are indicated, and only urgent measures, using
decoctions, are meaningful. The ultimate purpose in both approaches, however,
is to prevent adverse effects and maximize beneficial effects. For this
purpose, a determination is made of the appropriate medication, the correct
dosage, and the right form. That is to say, the means of regulating the
effects of the drug seems to vary according to the stage of the disease,
but the aim of regulating the effects is one and the same.
The Order of Administering Medication
Concerning the order in which medication
should be administered, Yan Zhi gives several cases of pathological conditions
as examples. His explanations are based on the same medical concepts and
viewpoints used to explain the effects of tonics, purgatives, and harmonizing
drugs as well as the differences in effect caused by varying the form of
medication. Some of my observations here will necessarily overlap with
things already stated in the previous sections.
(l) For patients with a pathogenic
factor that must be expelled, but whose essence of life is exhausted: Purgatives
will aggravate the pathological condition, so administer harmonizing drugs
first. After that, administer purgatives, but never for small children.
(Article 13)
(2) For patients with a pathogenic
factor that must be expelled with purgatives: First administer purgatives
by decoction, then switch to purgatives in the pill or powder form, but
also administer decoctions from time to time. (Article 14)
(3) For patients in whom the pathogenic
factor has been expelled with purgatives, but whose physical strength has
been exhausted: Tonic decoctions cause the pathology to recur, so either
prescribe rest or harmonizing drugs. Then administer controlled amounts
of tonics in pill or powder form. (Article 15)
(4) For prevention of disease in those
who are susceptible to disease despite having ample physical strength,
and for those who have pathological matter in the chest or abdomen: Expel
the pathological matter with purgative decoction. Then administer tonics
in pill or powder form. (Article 16)
(5) For prevention of disease in those
who are weak and have taken tonics over a long period, or in those with
stagnation of food in the abdomen: Administer only purgatives. (Article
16)
In item (l), the physiological condition
is such that the adverse effects of purgatives appear. Therefore, physiological
condition is improved first with harmonizing drugs, and only then are purgatives
administered. Tonics are not used to improve physiological condition in
this case because of their adverse effects, which could strengthen the
pathogenic factor. In the case of young children, however, purgatives are
not to be administered even in the second stage of treatment. It can be
seen from this that Yan Zhi considered young children with a weak constitution
to be prone to the adverse effects of purgatives even after their condition
was improved with harmonizing drugs.
Item (2) presents a basic methodology
for cases in which purgatives are to be administered over a long period.
The switch to pill or powder form prevents the adverse effects resulting
from the powerful action of the decocted form. Later on, decoctions are
administered from time to time to assist the beneficial effects of the
purgative in the pill or powder form. The logic underlying this methodology
is sound, but the same objective could be attained without using different
forms of medication: by adjusting the dose of the decoction. Therefore,
it seems natural to interpret this example in item (2) as being more of
a description of the differences in effect of different forms of purgatives.
Item (3) presents a method for restoring
physical strength after it has been depleted by use of purgatives. Normally
we would think of tonics for effecting recovery from a depleted condition,
but tonics are not to be administered right away because of the possible
adverse effects. In such a case, harmonizing drugs, which have no adverse
effects, could be used as in item (l), but here rest is recommended as
the first step. After physical strength is almost restored, pill and powder
tonics are administered, with special care given to the dosage. This last
step is taken in consideration of the adverse effects of tonics if the
effect is too strong, even after physiological condition has almost returned
to normal.
What then is the reason for further
prescribing tonics after physical strength is nearly restored? This can
only be to raise physical strength to an even higher level than before
to build a healthier constitution, increase resistance to disease, and
ensure a long life. The aim here is nothing other than hygiene. Recall
that in Article l, Yan Zhi states that hygiene should be studied last.
By this we can understand Yan Zhi's perception of medicine, in which hygiene
based on the use of medication actually does more harm than good, unless
based on sound knowledge and correct administration in stages.
Item (4) deals with persons who are
prone to illness and who desire tonic medication to prevent illness. Yan
Zhi submits that the accumulation of pathological matter in the body is
the cause of susceptibility to illness, and he suggests expelling this
matter first with purgative decoctions. It is permissible to induce strong
diarrhea with the purgatives in this situation because the body is not
yet weakened.
Once the pathological matter causing
the susceptibility to illness is expelled, it would seem that the objective
of preventing illness has been achieved. It should therefore be appropriate
to prohibit the use of tonics and prescribe rest or harmonizing drugs at
most. Yet tonic medication is prescribed later, as desired by the patient.
This is probably due to the fact that item (4) concerns cases prior to
the appearance of disease, so the adverse effects of the tonics in exacerbating
pathology do not appear that often. Nevertheless, tonic medication is limited
to the pill and powder forms, and moreover, the selective use of such medication
by prescribing according to the presence of heat or cold in the body is
advised. As mentioned earlier, aconiti tuber was probably among the tonic
drugs used for warming, and rehmanniae radix among those used for cooling.
Thus, not only are the tonics used in their more benign forms, but care
is also taken not to cause problems like aggravating a febrile condition
by using warming drugs like aconiti tuber. Adverse effects were so carefully
avoided probably not only for the sake of the patient's health, but also
because such effects could be detrimental to the physician's own life and
position.
Item (5) is another case of administering
medication to prevent illness. It is concerned with those with weak constitutions
who have taken tonics over a long period, or those who eat an overly rich
diet. Yan Zhi thinks that excessive consumption of tonics or rich foods
overburdens the digestive system and produces adverse effects on the body.
In his medical perception, tonics can of course have an adverse effect
by accumulating in the abdomen, but food and drink can also become a pathogenic
factor in their own right, as stated in Article 2. In cases such as this,
he only recommends using purgatives to expel the accumulated pathological
matter. The reason purgatives can be prescribed for those with a weak constitution
is probably that, as stated in Article 5, physiological function counteracting
the adverse effects of medication has been developed through habitual use
of medication. The use of purgatives alone is advised because if tonics
are then taken again, they will merely accumulate in the abdomen. Furthermore,
it is possible that the patient's strength will recover on its own once
the accumulated matter is expelled. On the whole, the example in item (5)
can be taken as a countermeasure for the practice of ingesting tonic drugs
for hygiene and longevity, which must have been quite common among the
upper class in that period.
Prognosis
In Article 13, Yan Zhi states that
those who are not expert in pulse palpation cannot know how long a patient's
recovery will take. Setting aside the problem of pulse palpation, I will
instead examine what other approaches are suggested for judging the prognosis
and will analyze their logical bases. Let us begin by examining Yan Zhi's
references to prognosis one by one.
At the beginning of Article 13, "serious
febrile disease affecting physical strength, appetite, and behavior" is
contrasted with "mild disease affecting appetite and sleep." Here, factors
such as appetite and physical strength refer in every case to physiological
function and not to pathological symptoms such as fever or pain. On the
other hand, in the latter half of this same article, a case is mentioned
in which recovery appears to be only three to five days away, and Yan Zhi
states that the pathogenic factor is probably already expelled and only
the physical strength has to return. This distinction between a pathogenic
factor and physical strength is identical to the distinction noted earlier
(see beginning of this paragraph) thus indicating that Yan Zhi always discriminated
between a patient's physiology and pathology, as well as noting the corresponding
conditions and symptoms, as pointed out before.
This means that a prognosis of recovery
in three to five days is based on the observation that the pathological
symptoms are already gone. In such cases, Yan Zhi recommends rest and observation
of the patient's progress: in other words, check the prognosis by putting
the patient under observation to confirm the complete disappearance of
pathological symptoms and the recovery of normal physiological functions.
This is obviously advice for a case with a favorable prognosis.
Article 13 also contains an example
of an unfavorable prognosis. It is a case in which the essence of life
has been exhausted. Yan Zhi states that when purgatives are administered
to such patients, the adverse effects will further exhaust the essence
of life and the patient could be confined in bed for a year. In this case,
the prognosis is judged to be unfavorable because, while the pathological
symptoms are mild, the physiological damage is severe. Article 17 gives
two similar cases, neither of which are conditions which can be cured after
three to five days of treatment. One is a case of an extremely debilitating
disease, and the other is one of an illness caused by wind. The former
plainly involves severe physiological damage.
The nature of the latter illness is,
for some reason, not explained in this article. It can be inferred, however,
that an illness "due to wind" was regarded as a condition of severe pathology
for the following reasons: First, failure to heal in three to five days;
second, wind is at the top of the list of pathogenic factors in Article
2. Further, wind is the first pathogenic factor mentioned in Article 9
among the seasonal illnesses contracted during menstruation.
Of course, this assumption (the severity
of illnesses "due to wind") is not explicitly stated anywhere. It is more
than likely, however, that if pathological symptoms are severe, then physiological
condition is also damaged to some extent. In any event, the prognosis for
the two cases given in Article 17 is not good. The text also states that,
if these two conditions occur simultaneously, recovery can take from one
score to over one hundred days.
To summarize, the prognosis is judged
according to the extent of physiological damage and the severity of pathological
symptoms. The standards and methodology for determining the prognosis are
thus quite unequivocal. Clearly, Yan Zhi consciously set aside complicated
traditional medical theories and simplified all pathological conditions
into "strong" or "weak" states of physiology and pathology. Leaving aside
the question of the practicality of his method of arriving at a prognosis,
understanding it allows us to appreciate Yan Zhi's pragmatic approach towards
medicine.
I have thus far examined Articles
13 through 17, focusing on several different topics. Following this detailed
examination, what can be seen from an overall perspective of Yan Zhi's
medical views is that prevention of the adverse effects of drugs is given
equal if not greater emphasis than their application for beneficial effects.
Yan Zhi maintains this attitude not only in his views on treatment of acute
cases, but also in his views on prevention of relapses. Another key point
is that factors indicating physiological condition, such as physical strength,
are given equal weight as the signs of pathology in deciding on such matters
as the pathological condition, treatment principle to be used, effectiveness
of treatment, means of preventing relapse, and prognosis. Yan Zhi's approach
to medicine is equivalent to a practical approach for "hygiene in treatment
after the onset of illness."
CONCLUSION
The foregoing has been an analysis
of the connection between treatment and hygiene in the medicine of Chen
Yan Zhi, author of the medieval Chinese medical text Xiao Pin Fang.
In Yan Zhi's approach, the most important principle in traditional hygiene,
the regulation and improvement of physiological function, is consistently
applied to every aspect of medical treatment. This seems to have been based
on a strongly critical attitude towards his contemporaries' attitudes on
treatment and hygiene, and he sets forth an approach to medicine which
systemizes the traditional medicine of his time, and does so according
to his unique views.
In Yan Zhi's time, medical treatments
and hygiene practices using medication tended to have inherent biases,
with the former aimed only at suppressing pathological symptoms and the
latter being solely aimed at regulating and improving physiological function.
Yan Zhi argues for and explains in detail the need to consider both aspects
of treatment, to do so from the outbreak of the disease to recovery, and
for the purpose of initial treatment as well as preventing relapse. He
places special emphasis on the recognition of individual factors and resultant
physiological tendencies, as well as on an analysis of the background of
the disease, which are matters physicians often fail to take into account.
As some practical examples of individual
factors, Yan Zhi mentions physical strength, age, sex, history of taking
medication, area of residence, and life style, and uses these factors to
explain physiological tendencies. Based on these factors, he explains the
ways of modifying a prescription; of determining dosage; of ascertaining
the connection between physical constitution and mechanism of contracting
disease; of choosing medication, form of medication, and order of administration;
and of judging the patient's prognosis. The consistent aim throughout all
of this is to make full use of the beneficial effects of medication against
a pathology, and also to prevent the adverse effects of medication from
affecting the patient's physiology. Yan Zhi's conception of pharmacological
effects was extremely pragmatic, and many of his ideas still apply today
in modern pharmacology.
I would like to call special attention
to one aspect of the Xiao Pin Fang. The Yin-Yang*41and Five Element principles, fundamental concepts in traditional Chinese
medicine, are not mentioned at all in the articles I examined. Also, very
few traditional medical terms are used, and no explanation is given of
them. In their place are the concepts and principles outlined in Figure
2 and Table 1. Perhaps this simplification is due to the introductory nature
of this text. Nevertheless, we can see a unique rationalism in Yan Zhi's
presentation which, while being based on traditional medical concepts,
stands in clear contrast to them in its pragmatic and logical approach.
If a leap of logic may be permitted, his attitude and approach to medicine,
in its pragmatism and rationalism, bear a closer resemblance to the kanpo*42style of Chinese medicine practiced in Japan from the latter half of the
Edo*43 period (eighteenth century) than
to the mainstream of Chinese medical thinking from the Jin-Yuan*44period (twelfth to fourteenth century). This issue calls for more discussion
in the future among scholars in this field.
Chinese medicine is a system with
an unbroken tradition extending from ancient times to the present. In its
long history, Chinese medicine developed a complexity and copiousness which
owed a great deal to the vastness of the Asian subcontinent, with its tremendous
variety of geographical regions and cultures. On the other hand, the repeated
rise and decline of various governments and cultural groups over time has
without question made it very difficult to safely preserve written documents.
In many cases, only fragments or titles of documents remain to tantalize
us today. In spite of the odds, a substantial number of documents have
stood against the flow of one or two millennium and survived destruction,
disfiguration, and obscurity to reach us intact today. The Xiao Pin
Fang is one such precarious document, and its discovery by the author
and his colleagues in Tokyo is something on the order of a miracle. This
text contains many significant and noteworthy revelations. In this article,
I have dealt with only a small portion of our findings, attempting to highlight
the relationship between medical treatment and the philosophy of hygiene.
NOTES AND REFERENCES
1) Hiroshi Kosoto, "A Introductory Study on the Xiao Pin Fang; with Reference to a Recently Discovered Old Manuscript", Journal of the Japan Society of Medical History, 1986, Vol.32, p.1-25.
2)Su Wen (references here-in-after are based onHuangdi Neijing Su Wen: reissued by the National Chinese Medicine & Drug Institute, Taibei, 1960), Vol.1, Chap.2.
3)Lao Zi, reissued by Zhonghua Shuju, Taibei, 1981, Chap. 71.
4)Huai Nan Zi, reissued by Xin Wenfeng Chuban Gongsi, Taibei, 1978, Vol. 16.
5) Hidemi Ishida, "Medical Thought of theXiao Pin Fang, Bunka, 1986, Vol.50, No.1-2, p.1-16.
6)Su Wen, Vol.22, Chap.74.
7) Su Wen, Vol.20, Chap.70.
8) Ling Shu (references here-in-after are based on Xin Kan Huangdi Neijing Ling Shu, reprinted in the Ming dynasty of China, currently stored at the Naikaku Bunko of the State Documents Library, Tokyo), Vol. 16, Chap.53.
9) Shennong Bencao Jing (references here-in-after are based on Jingshi Zhengrei Daguan Bencao reissued by Hirokawa Shyoten, Tokyo, 1970), explanatory notes, Art, l,3, 10.
10) Su Wen, Vol.9, Chap.31.
11) Zhang Zhong Jing, Shanghan Lun (references here-in-after are based on Song ban Shanghan Lun, reprinted in the Ming dynasty of China, currently stored at the Naikaku Bunko of the State Documents Library, Tokyo), Vol.7&9. In those volumes, detailed contra-indications of sudorifics and laxatives are described.
12)Jingshi Zhengrei Daguan Bencao, Vol.8, the front side of 18th leaves, Art. Mahuan, black printed words.
13) Zhang Zhong ling, Jin Gui Yaolue (Xinbian Jin Gui Fanglun, reprinted in the Yuan dynasty of China, currently stored at the Beijing University Library), Vol.3, Chap.22 5th-6th leaves.
14) Su Wen, Vol.4, Chap.12. Vol.20, Chap.70.
15) Ling Shu, Vol.18, Chap.64.
16) Sun Si Miao, Beiji Qian Jin Yaofang, reissued by Renmin Weisheng Chubanshe, Beijing, 1955, p.138.
17) Yasuyori Tanba, Ishinho, reissued by Japan Koigaku Shiryo Center, Tokyo, 1973, Vol.8, the front side of 7th leaves.
18) a) Jingshi Zhengrei Daguan Bencao, Vol. 1, the back side of 15th leaves, explanatory notes, Art. 11, white printed words. b) Su Wen, Vol.22, Chap.74, the back side of 15th leaves & the front side of 28th leaves.
19)Jingshi Zhengrei Daguan Bencao; Vol.10, the front side of 15th leaves, Art. Dahuan, white printed words. Vol.6, the front side of 26th leaves, Art. Gan Dihuan, white printed words. Vol. 10, the back side of 1st leaf, Art. Fuzi, white printed words.
20) Makoto Mayanagi, "An investigation of Yao-Xing theory; on Xing-Ping Fang", Japanese Journal of Oriental Medicine, Vol. 33, No.4, p. 115, 1983.
21)Jingshi Zhengrei Daguan Bencao, Vol.6, the back side of 46th leaves, Art. Chaihu.
22)Jingshi Zhengrei Daguan Bencao, Vol.6, the front side of 23rd leaves, Art. Gancao.
23)Jingshi Zhengrei Daguan Bencao, Vol.6, the front side of 15th leaves, Art. renshen.
24) Yasuo Otsuka, "On the system of drug categorization; as seen in ancient Materia Medica of East & West",Journal of Kanpo Medicine, Vol. 15, No.4, p.3-11, 1968.
25) Zhang Zhong ling,Shanghan Lun, Vol.9, the back side of 14th leaves.