Resources for Delirium/Acute Confusion

Several resources and helpful websites are listed below.


 

  • Practice Guidelines for the assessment and treatment of patients with delirium:
  • Source: National Guideline Clearinghouse www.guideline.gov

     

    Nurses Recognition

    Inouye, S. K., Foreman, M. D., Mion, L. C., Katz, K. H., Cooney, L. M. Jr. (2001). Nurses' recognition of delirium and its symptoms: Comparison of nurse and researcher ratings. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161, 2467-2473.
    "Nurses often missed delirium when present, but rarely identified delirium when absent."
    "Four independent risk factors for underrecognition by nurses were : hypoactive delirium, age 80 years and older, vision impairment, and dementia. ... Patients with 3 or 4 risk factors had a 20-fold risk for underrecognition of delirium by nurses."

    Risk Factors of Delirium Among Medical Patients:

    Assessment of Delirium/Acute Confusion:

    Review of Assessment Methods/Instruments:

    Smith, M.J., Breitbart, W.S., & Platt, M.M.(1995). A critique of instruments and methods to detect, diagnose, and rate delirium, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 10, 35-77.
    Comprehensive review of assessment methods, inclouding diagnostic criteria, observational and interview scales, and pathophysiological measures.

    Rapp, C. G., Wakefield, B., Fundrat, M., Mentes, J., Tripp-Reimer, T., Culp, K. et al. (2000). Acute confusion assessment instruments: Clinical versus research usability. Applied Nursing Research, 13, 37-45.
    Review of Mini-Mental Status Exam, Delirium Rating Scale, Delirium Symptom Index, Confusion Assessment Method, Clinical Assessment of Confusion, and NEECHAM Confusion Scale regarding their clinical and research utility as well as psychometric properties. Recommendations: use Mini-Mental, NEECHAM, and Confusion Assessment Method.

    Cacchione, P. Z. (2002). Four acute confusion assessment instruments: reliability and validity for use in long-term care facilities. Journal of Gerontological Nursing 28(1), 12-19.
    A psychometric study of Visual Analogue Sacle of Confusion (VAS-C), Clinical Assessment of Confusion - type A and B (CAC-A/B), and NEECHAM Confusion Scale (NEECHAM) in long-term care setting. Recommendations: use VAS-C for brief screening, use NEECHAM for detailed assessment.

    NEECHAM Confusion Scale:

    "The NEECHAM Confusion Scale (Copyright 1985/1989, Virginia J. Neelon)" [Figure2-4]; and
    "Instructions for Scoring the NEECHAM Confusion Scale" [Box 2-1]
    Pages: 91-94 of "Gerontological Nursing: Concepts and Practice" (2nd ed.)
    Editors: Matteson, E. S. McConnell & A. D. Linton
    Publishers: W.B.Saunders, Philadelphia
    Publication Year: 1997

    Neelon, V. J., Champagne, M. T., Carlson, J. R., & Funk, S. G. (1996). The NEECHAM confusion scale: Construction, validation, and clinical testing. Nursing Research, 45, 324-330.
    -->Psychometric paper.

    Clinical Assessment of Confusion (CAC):

    Vermeersch, P.E.H. (1992). Clinical assessment of confusion. In S. G. Funk, E. M. Tornquist, M. T. Champagne, R. A. Wiese (Eds.), Key aspects of elder care: Managing falls, incontinence, and cognitive impairment (pp. 251-262). New York: Springer.
    Contains the original scales of the CAC type A (short version) and type B (full version) with psychometric information.

    Vermerrsch, P. E. H., & Henly, S. J. (1997). Validation of the structure for the "Clinical Assessment of Confusion-A." Nursign Research, 46, 208-213.
    Psychometric properties of the CAC-A with mailed samples of nurses' ratings of "confusion."

    Confusion Assessment Method (CAM):

    Inouye, S.K., van Dyck, C.H., Alessi, C.A., Balkin, S., Siegal, A.P., Horwitz, R.I. (1990). Clarifying confusion: The Confusion Assessment Method. Annals of Internal Medicine, 113, 941-948.
    --> Widely used, easy four-step diagnostic algorithm: See also updated version of CAM below (CAM-ICU).

    Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE):

    Original Folstein's MMSE:
    ->A test of global cognitive function
    Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for clinicians. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.

    It is known that some of the MMSE items have age and educational bias (or effect). Here are several articles that address this issue and strategies to adjust the total score.

    Anthony, J. C., LeResche, L., Niaz, U., von Korff, M. R. &, Folstein, M. F. (1982).
    Limits of the 'Mini-Mental State' as a screening test for dementia and delirium among
    hospital patients. Psychological Medicine, 12, 397-408.

    Bleecker, M. L., Bolla-Wilson, K., Kawas, C., & Agnew, J. (1988). Age-specific norms for
    the Mini-Mental State Exam. Neurology, 38, 1565-1568.

    Crum, R. M., Anthony, J. C., Bassett, S. S., & Folstein, M. F. (1993). Population-based
    norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. Journal of
    American Medical Association, 269,
    2386-2391.
    [This JAMA article has a table of mean, S.D., Median of the total MMSE scores weighted by age, sex, and race based on the 1980 US population census; population-based norms,
    measured by trained interviewers at community settings; modified items -- adopted "serial
    7's" or "spell 'world' backwards" - whichever scored higher].

    Standardized MMSE
    -> This version was developed to standardize administration methods, including verbal instructions/questions to be given to patients, time limits, and scoring methods. The SMMSE has a shorter administration time, an increased inter-rater reliability, etc. than does the MMSE.

    Primary Sources:
    Molloy, D. W. (1999). The Standardized Mini-Mental Status Exam (SMMSE). New Grange Press, Troy, Ontario, Canada.

    Molloy, D. W., & Standish, T. I. (1997). A guide to the standardized Mini-Mental State
    Examination. International Psychogeriatrics, 9 (Suppl.1), 87-94. [discussion, 143-150.]
    [This is a conference minutes. I would recommend you to obtain the above original SMMSE from the author.]

    Psychometrics:
    Molly, D. W., Alemeyehu, E., & Roberts, R. (1991). Reliability of a Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination compared with the traditional Mini-Mental State Examination. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 102-105.

    Secondary source:
    Pangman, V. C., Sloan, J., & Guse, L. (2000). An examination of psychometric properties
    of the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination:
    Implications for clinical practice. Applied Nursing Research, 13, 209-213.
    [The authors addressed the controversial issue of "time limits" in the SMMSE. Limited time allowed in each item may overestimate "cognitive disability" ... respondents may have physical disability that takes longer time than is allowed.]

    Modified MMSE (3MS)
    -> This version has additional four questions and extended/modified scoring methods, which may help identifying subtile cognitive decline such as early stage of dementia or dleirium.

    Primary Source:
    Teng, E. L., & Chui, H. C. (1987). The modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) Examination.
    Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 48, 314-318.

    Secondary Source (a study used 3MS):
    * McDowell, I., Kristjansson, B., Hill, G. B., & Hebert, R. (1997). Community screening
    for dementia: the Mini Mental State Exam and Modified Mini-Mental State Exam compared.
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50, 377-383.
    [Authors say that the psychometric properties of the 3MS are superior to the MMSE,
    probably due to the extended scoring system of the 3MS rather than to these additional
    questions in the 3MS.]

    Delirium in the ICU:

    Justic, M. (2000). Does "ICU psychosis" really exist? Critical Care Nurse, 20(3), 28-37; quiz 38-39.

    Ely et al. (2001) Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit: An Under-Recognized Syndrome of Organ Dysfunction

    Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU):

    ICU Derilium and Cognitive Impairment Study Group:
    This site includes patient/family info, delirium assessment (CAM-ICU) in different languages, treatment, and other resources.

    Psychometrics Preliminary Report:
    Ely EW, Margolin R, Francis J, et al. Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: Validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med 2001; 29:1370-1379.

    Psychometrics Paper of Revised CAM-ICU:
    Ely, E. W., Inouye, S. K., Bernard, G. R. Gordon, S., Francis, J., May, L., Truman, B. et al. (2001). Delirium in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: Validity and Reliability of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)
    Journal of American Medical Association, 286, 2703-2710. [Abstract]

    Intervention Studies:

    Inouye, S. K., Bogardus, S. T., Charpentier, P. A., Leo-Summers, L., Acampoora, D. et al. (1999) A multicomponent intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. New England Journal of Medicine, 340, 669-676.

    Newspaper articles: Short reports: Sum Media-Canada site

    Newspaper articles: Detailed reports: Yale U site

     

    Review and Theoretical Basis:

    Qualitative Studies:

    Subjective experience of delirium:

    Schofield, I. (1997). A small exploratory study of the reaction of older people to an episode of delirium. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25, 942-52.



    2008-05-16, Assembled by Watabou 2008
    The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University Medical Information Network (UMIN), Japan.